I am officially over at wordpress now -- I love it!
Stop by and say HI :)
Friday, March 31, 2006
Saturday, March 25, 2006
New Blog!
My sis just introduced me to another blog arena -- www.wordpress.com, and I LOVE IT! It seems easier to manage -- a good thing for a non-techie like me!
I think I'm movin' on.
It'll be under construction for a bit, but come visit me over at:
www.onebeggarsbread.wordpress.com
I think I'm movin' on.
It'll be under construction for a bit, but come visit me over at:
www.onebeggarsbread.wordpress.com
Friday, March 17, 2006
In This Corner...
---
My Amble Ramble Yahoo group (a support group for Charlotte Mason Education) has been abuzz this week over Linda Hirshman's recent assertion that a woman's place is in the office. Reading articles by Hirshman alongside Home Education by my Charlotte Mason, list member Kari Hannon was struck by the incredible difference between these two women.
I can imagine the boxing arena full of cheering women as we set Linda Hirchsman, a prominent feminist thinker up against Charlotte Mason, prominent educator from the late 1800's/early 1900's whose work has recently made a comeback to greatly influence the modern home education movement.
Kari gave me permission to reprint her thoughts here:
In my reading of Hirshman's article, it is clear to me that she has no clue what motherhood and "staying at home" truly is. Of educated women who choose to stay at home she writes, "these daughters of the upper classes will be bearing most of the burden of the work always associated with the lowest caste: sweeping and cleaning bodily waste...They have voluntarily become untouchables." So, she equates it solely with the physical and lowly tasks of cleaning homes and children. A maid or janitor. Contrast that view with Charlotte Mason's understanding of the value of motherhood.
First, Mason, an early 20th Century British educator, quotes another person called Pestalozzi, who said, "The mother is qualified, and qualified by the Creator Himself, to become the principal agent in the development of her child; ...and what is demanded of her is--a thinking love...God has given to the child all the faculties of our nature, but the grand point remains undecided--how shall this heart, this head, these hands be employed? to whose service shall they be dedicated? ... Maternal love is the first agent in education."
Then Mason writes, "We are waking up to our duties and in proportion, as mothers become more highly educated and efficient, they will doubtless feel the more strongly that the education of their children during the first six years of life is an undertaking hardly to be entrusted to any hand but their own. And they will take it up as their profession--that is, with the diligence, regularity, and punctuality which men bestow on their professional labours." (Home Education, vol.1)
When I first read Mason's words, my reaction was, "Alas...if only that were true!" To me, daycares are much too prevalent and I have not seen this awakening in educated mothers that Mason envisioned.
But Hirshman's article gave me hope!
Hirshman is non-plussed that all these educated mothers are leaving the workplace and returning home. "This less-flourishing sphere is not the natural or moral responsibility only of women," she writes.
The fact that top, "elite", educated women are choosing to stay home and don't see it as "unjust" should clue her in to the fact that maybe it IS natural, brings self-fulfillment and happiness and is, yes, even honorable. If things don't stack up as you think they should, go back and check your hypothesis. But that's unthinkable; instead, she points back at the feminist system and blames it for not going far enough. It targeted education and the workplace, but obviously those were not the correct targets. The real target is the home. "Feminists must acknowledge that the family is to 2005 what the workplace was to 1964 and the vote to 1920." In other words, family is holding women back from their full potential as human beings. Only when they are freed from the traditional understanding of home and family will women be able to "flourish".
The fact that these women and their families "seem happy" and would consider themselves as "flourishing" means nothing to Hirshman. It doesn't matter what they think, because she knows what is better for them than they do themselves. "We care because what they do is bad for them, is certainly bad for society, and is widely imitated."
Ahh, thank you Ms. Hirshman, for your loving concern. However, I see that your concern is not truly for women. If it were, you would rejoice with them that they are happy in their chosen field of motherhood. Instead, you lament that they have a choice at all. "Prying women out of their traditional roles is not going to be easy. It will require rules."
Her concern is not truly for society, either, for if it were, she would be more concerned about the children she is so quick to hand over to the casual daycare worker. The good of society does not rest solely on the shoulders of those in the workforce or those currently holding the "power"--be it man or woman. A society can change for the better or for worse with each successive generation. Therefore, any society must look to the future and ensure the proper raising of its young. "Children," writes Charlotte Mason, "are, in truth, to be regarded less as personal property than as public trusts, put into the hands of parents that they may make the very most of them for the good of society." And who cares more for the success of her child than a mother? Mason writes further, "This is why we hear so frequently of great men who have had good mothers-- that is, mothers who brought up their children themselves, and did not make over their gravest duty to indifferent persons."
No, Ms. Hirshman's concern is for money, power and honor--her own definition of honor, of course, which seems to be related solely to money and power. Her love of money and power has blinded her. She is blind to the truth that, not only are men and women different, but that the world benefits when we embrace those differences, allowing both men and women to flourish in the roles for which they were created.
I would recommend that Ms. Hirshman go back to the drawing board and do a bit more research into 1) the natures of God and man and 2) the importance of training in the development of a child. Once she has a deeper grasp of both of those, she will be able to see why feminism has not "worked" to her current satisfaction. Her response may no longer be a bewildered, "What is going on?" but a victorious, "Hallelujah!"
---
Thank you for sharing, Kari!
More Baby Famine in the News
This idea is popping up all over the place!
I came across 2 articles today about population statistics and how they relate to conservative values and modern thought.
This one from News Max (thanks for the link, Mom!): Conservative Baby Boom; Liberal Baby Bust
And this one from Melanie Phillips: Britain's Lop-sided Baby Famine
Interesting reading!
I came across 2 articles today about population statistics and how they relate to conservative values and modern thought.
This one from News Max (thanks for the link, Mom!): Conservative Baby Boom; Liberal Baby Bust
And this one from Melanie Phillips: Britain's Lop-sided Baby Famine
Interesting reading!
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Secular Baby-Making, or Lack Thereof
My dad recently left a comment with a link to this USA Today article about the Red States out-populating the Blue States (for more of my thoughts on this, see It's the Sex, Stupid).
Here's another article, along the same vein, from The Washington Times on on how the French Government is paying well-educated, working women to produce a third child.
I suppose none can truly deny the influence a mother (or whomever is raising the children) has upon the next generation -- even upon whether or not that next generation will have children of their own.
They say that man is mighty,
He governs land and sea,
He wields a mighty scepter
O'er lesser powers that be;
But a mightier power and stronger
Man from his throne has hurled,
For the hand that rocks the cradle
Is the hand that rules the world.
-- William Ross Wallace, 1865 or 66
Here's another article, along the same vein, from The Washington Times on on how the French Government is paying well-educated, working women to produce a third child.
I suppose none can truly deny the influence a mother (or whomever is raising the children) has upon the next generation -- even upon whether or not that next generation will have children of their own.
They say that man is mighty,
He governs land and sea,
He wields a mighty scepter
O'er lesser powers that be;
But a mightier power and stronger
Man from his throne has hurled,
For the hand that rocks the cradle
Is the hand that rules the world.
-- William Ross Wallace, 1865 or 66
Monday, March 13, 2006
Another Goofy Test!
| You Are Likely an Only Child |
 At work and school, you do best when you're organizing. When you love someone, you tend to worry about them. In friendship, you are emotional and sympathetic. Your ideal careers are: radio announcer, finance, teaching, ministry, and management. You will leave your mark on the world with organizational leadership, maybe as the author of self-help books. |
Ron and I are goofing around with the kids taking all these stupid, boring, waste-of-time quizzes tonight (like, What's Your Hillbilly Name?) -- but check this one! It predicted fairly well my birth order. My sis is almost 9 years my junior, and according to the New Birth Order Book by Kevin Leman, we are both considered "only children."
What's Your World View?
 | You scored as Cultural Creative. Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized religion but still feels as if there is something greater than ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious. Life has a meaning outside of the rational.
What is Your World View? (updated) created with QuizFarm.com |
Hmmm. I'm equal parts fundamentalist, postmodern, and romanticist? Explains my confusion over The Emerging Church :)
Silly little quiz. What's it say your world view is?
Friday, March 10, 2006
Thursday, March 09, 2006
The Paradoxical Commandments
People are illogical, unreasonable, and self-centered.
Love them anyway.
If you do good, people will accuse you of selfish ulterior motives.
Do good anyway.
If you are successful, you will win false friends and true enemies.
Succeed anyway.
The good you do today will be forgotten tomorrow.
Do good anyway.
Honesty and frankness make you vulnerable.
Be honest and frank anyway.
The biggest men and women with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the smallest men and women with the smallest minds.
Think big anyway.
People favor underdogs but follow only top dogs.
Fight for a few underdogs anyway.
What you spend years building may be destroyed overnight.
Build anyway.
People really need help but may attack you if you do help them.
Help people anyway.
Give the world the best you have and you'll get kicked in the teeth.
Give the world the best you have anyway.
by Kent M. Keith
Sunday, March 05, 2006
It's the Sex, Stupid
I recently read a long Canadian opinion piece called It's the Demography, Stupid: The Real Reason the West is in Danger of Extinction. It's a fascinating secular take on why Islam is the fastest growing religion...and how the Western World is going extinct. In the article, Mark Steyn states, ''the hard data on babies around the Western world is that they're running out a lot faster than the oil is. 'Replacement' fertility rate--i.e., the number you need for merely a stable population, not getting any bigger, not getting any smaller--is 2.1 babies per woman." The author quotes statistics from many different countries, demonstrating that the countries well above this replacement rate tend to be Islamic, and many western nations fall below the replacement rate.
Steyn throws in the following numbers in an attempt to scare the liberal left about the growth of not only the Islamic nations but also conservative Americans -- his words should greatly encourage those of us on the conservative side of the fence: "In America, demographic trends suggest that the blue states ought to apply for honorary membership of the EU: In the 2004 election, John Kerry won the 16 with the lowest birthrates; George W. Bush took 25 of the 26 states with the highest. By 2050, there will be 100 million fewer Europeans, 100 million more Americans--and mostly red-state Americans."
Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D, wrote an incredible response to It's the Demography, Stupid entitled, It's the Sex, Stupid: A Response to Mark Steyn. If you don't have time to read the original article, I hope you'll find the time to read this response. Dr. Morse feels that the way western culture views sexuality has "created the demographic collapse of the West, and the human void into which Islamic fertility is rapidly flooding."
Speaking from a secular, naturalist viewpoint, Dr. Morse says that "the modern world has completely lost sight of the social purposes of sex. We now regard sex as a private recreational activity, with no moral or social significance. Unlimited sexual activity without a live baby resulting is the quintessential modern entitlement."
Dr. Morse goes on to describe consumer sex (what she often refers to as Wal-Mart Sex): Sex is a consumer good and our sex partners are objects that please us more or less well. Morse submits that this view of sex is "at the root of the West's demographic death spiral...Consumer sex inverts the whole natural order of sexuality. Instead of drawing us out of ourselves and into relationship with others, we turn sex inward, on ourselves and our own individual pleasure."
Dr. Morse states that demographic collapse is hardly surprising. She observes the risky business of having children without a permanent bond between parents. As we as a country move toward indifference as to whether a child has parents who are married to each other, or even whether the parents are of different or the same sex, we create a culture that is "hardly conducive to having a higher than replacement level of fertility."
As a woman who waited until reaching tenure to have a child, she recognizes that she is "part of the problem of the well-educated, high-income women who can't bring themselves to replace themselves" and ends her article with these challenging words:
"What women do and want will be decisive in determining whether the West survives the demographic clash with Islam. If intelligent, educated women believe children are an unacceptable distraction from their careers, we won't have many kids. If women regard flash cards as beneath their dignity, educating the next generation will be left to hired help. If women think raising a child alone is less trouble than dealing with a pesky man, we'll have a lot of stressed out single mothers and poorly raised kids.
"So, stay at home moms, don't let anyone tell you that you are wasting your talents. Without your contribution of a healthy, functioning next generation, all the strength of the U.S. military won't be enough to protect us from the primal force of Islam that believes in itself enough to replace itself. Your actions show that you believe in your civilization enough to invest in its future. "
As Dr. Morse points out, few have noticed the short, direct line between seeing sex as a commodity, to seeing a sex partner as a commodity, to seeing a baby as a commodity. If we in conservative Christian circles can grasp the depth, spirituality, and significance to these gifts from God -- sex, spouses, and children -- we will well be on our way to making a lasting mark on our world.
Steyn throws in the following numbers in an attempt to scare the liberal left about the growth of not only the Islamic nations but also conservative Americans -- his words should greatly encourage those of us on the conservative side of the fence: "In America, demographic trends suggest that the blue states ought to apply for honorary membership of the EU: In the 2004 election, John Kerry won the 16 with the lowest birthrates; George W. Bush took 25 of the 26 states with the highest. By 2050, there will be 100 million fewer Europeans, 100 million more Americans--and mostly red-state Americans."
Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D, wrote an incredible response to It's the Demography, Stupid entitled, It's the Sex, Stupid: A Response to Mark Steyn. If you don't have time to read the original article, I hope you'll find the time to read this response. Dr. Morse feels that the way western culture views sexuality has "created the demographic collapse of the West, and the human void into which Islamic fertility is rapidly flooding."
Speaking from a secular, naturalist viewpoint, Dr. Morse says that "the modern world has completely lost sight of the social purposes of sex. We now regard sex as a private recreational activity, with no moral or social significance. Unlimited sexual activity without a live baby resulting is the quintessential modern entitlement."
Dr. Morse goes on to describe consumer sex (what she often refers to as Wal-Mart Sex): Sex is a consumer good and our sex partners are objects that please us more or less well. Morse submits that this view of sex is "at the root of the West's demographic death spiral...Consumer sex inverts the whole natural order of sexuality. Instead of drawing us out of ourselves and into relationship with others, we turn sex inward, on ourselves and our own individual pleasure."
Dr. Morse states that demographic collapse is hardly surprising. She observes the risky business of having children without a permanent bond between parents. As we as a country move toward indifference as to whether a child has parents who are married to each other, or even whether the parents are of different or the same sex, we create a culture that is "hardly conducive to having a higher than replacement level of fertility."
As a woman who waited until reaching tenure to have a child, she recognizes that she is "part of the problem of the well-educated, high-income women who can't bring themselves to replace themselves" and ends her article with these challenging words:
"What women do and want will be decisive in determining whether the West survives the demographic clash with Islam. If intelligent, educated women believe children are an unacceptable distraction from their careers, we won't have many kids. If women regard flash cards as beneath their dignity, educating the next generation will be left to hired help. If women think raising a child alone is less trouble than dealing with a pesky man, we'll have a lot of stressed out single mothers and poorly raised kids.
"So, stay at home moms, don't let anyone tell you that you are wasting your talents. Without your contribution of a healthy, functioning next generation, all the strength of the U.S. military won't be enough to protect us from the primal force of Islam that believes in itself enough to replace itself. Your actions show that you believe in your civilization enough to invest in its future. "
As Dr. Morse points out, few have noticed the short, direct line between seeing sex as a commodity, to seeing a sex partner as a commodity, to seeing a baby as a commodity. If we in conservative Christian circles can grasp the depth, spirituality, and significance to these gifts from God -- sex, spouses, and children -- we will well be on our way to making a lasting mark on our world.
A Woman's Place is in the Office
Are you a competent, educated woman? Then according to Linda Hirschman, a prominent feminist thinker, you are above being "just a mom."
Apparently irritated at the large numbers of highly educated women who are intending to forgo careers over being "just" wives and mommas, Hirchman has spent quite a bit of time and energy arguing that "feminism has largely failed in its goals." Here's to more failure of this brand of feminism.
You can read all about Hirschman's recent appearance on Good Morning America here.
Al Mohler's take on it all? "These women [stay-at-home moms] not 'letting down the team.' To the contrary, they are holding civilization together where civilization begins--in the home."
Apparently irritated at the large numbers of highly educated women who are intending to forgo careers over being "just" wives and mommas, Hirchman has spent quite a bit of time and energy arguing that "feminism has largely failed in its goals." Here's to more failure of this brand of feminism.
You can read all about Hirschman's recent appearance on Good Morning America here.
Al Mohler's take on it all? "These women [stay-at-home moms] not 'letting down the team.' To the contrary, they are holding civilization together where civilization begins--in the home."
Friday, March 03, 2006
Teens Rock!
I was visiting The Rebelution site this morning, in eager anticipation of the conference coming up next weekend (which is SOLD OUT by the way -- I hope you already purchased your tickets!) and came across this awesome site:
REGENERATE OUR CULTURE
This new movement, largely directed by those of the teenage-persuasion, has this as part of its vision statement:
Regenerate Our Culture is an organization with the goal of regenerating our nation's worldview away from the post-modernism holding it and back to the Christian worldview it was first built on.
Ah, yes. This is the answer to the questions posed by the emerging church movement, I believe. While I do believe it is time for Modernism to get the right foot of fellowship out of the doors of our churches, I just don't see embracing post-modernism as the answer. Reformation, going back to the scriptures, learning from historical Christianity, transforming our lives so they are lived out through a Christian Worldview -- this is the direction we ought to be headed.
The "kids" over at Regenerating Our Culture seem to have this very idea in mind. And the fact that they are so young means their message should be vibrant, full of life and EDGY... kinda like the Bible, actually :)
I hope you check them out!
REGENERATE OUR CULTURE
This new movement, largely directed by those of the teenage-persuasion, has this as part of its vision statement:
Regenerate Our Culture is an organization with the goal of regenerating our nation's worldview away from the post-modernism holding it and back to the Christian worldview it was first built on.
Ah, yes. This is the answer to the questions posed by the emerging church movement, I believe. While I do believe it is time for Modernism to get the right foot of fellowship out of the doors of our churches, I just don't see embracing post-modernism as the answer. Reformation, going back to the scriptures, learning from historical Christianity, transforming our lives so they are lived out through a Christian Worldview -- this is the direction we ought to be headed.
The "kids" over at Regenerating Our Culture seem to have this very idea in mind. And the fact that they are so young means their message should be vibrant, full of life and EDGY... kinda like the Bible, actually :)
I hope you check them out!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)